Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks: The Italian Vetterli 1870/87/15
by FranticAlmond2
Among the rifles fielded during the First World War, the Italian Vetterli 1870/87/15 stands out for a number of reasons: its cumbersome length, at roughly 53 inches in total length (without a bayonet), its burdening weight, coming in at just over 10 pounds (also without a bayonet), and its age, with all the rifles being produced between 1872 and 1892. Its presence on the Italian front of WWI is a powerful reminder of the extreme supply stresses placed upon the countries engaged in a conflict which endlessly bled resources and manpower year after year. Italy was far from the only country to dig into their reserves of outdated and obsolescent rifles; Austria-Hungary saw Werndl rifles and some of the very early Mannlicher pattern rifles (1886, 1888, etc.) pulled out to see reserve service, France converted Gras rifles to fire their current issue 8mm Lebel round, and Germany made use of old Mauser 1871/84 rifles.
The Vetterli 1870/87/15 is set apart from many of the other obsolescent rifles of WWI, however, by the manner in which it was modified for use in a modern conflict. Along with the aforementioned Gras conversions and a small handful of other conversions, it is one of few rifles that was converted from its original large-bore chambering to a modern small-bore round. Further, it was made to have complete compatibility with the standard-issue ammunition and respective en-bloc clip as the primary service rifle of Italy, the M1891 Carcano. These modifications had the effect of truly modernizing the Vetterli rifle to the greatest extent possible while also keeping the cost and material requirements of such a conversion to a minimum.
A Brief History
Before discussing more specifics of the Vetterli 1870/87/15 rifle, some brief background history is useful to understanding the Vetterli rifle as it existed in Italy at the time of the first World War. The original design, adopted as the model 1870, was a simplified version of the Swiss Vetterli, which had been entered in the Italian trials. As was the case with many early black powder cartridge-firing rifles, the impetus was to adopt a rifle that was simple, rugged, reliable, and cost-effective. This tended to lead to more advanced systems of magazine-fed rifles being set aside in favor of simpler, single-shot designs. It was also influenced heavily by military tactics of the time as well as the belief that soldiers would expend too much ammunition too quickly with magazine-fed rifles, creating supply problems on the battlefield. With this in mind, the Italians adopted the Vetterli as the model 1870, which took form as a single-shot, black powder cartridge-firing rifle, with an angled loading/ejecting port and a rotating dust cover that surrounded the action. The iconic Vetterli bolt was retained, though it is not an exact copy of the Swiss Vetterli bolt and thus is not interchangeable. Perhaps the most important part of the system (in the context of the Italian Vetterlis) is the locking configuration: two symmetrical locking lugs on the rear of the bolt, which have a significantly large surface area between them.
Above: The 1870 Italian Vetterli
While other contemporaries of the time were more likely to simply make use of the bolt handle locking against the receiver (an asymmetrical locking configuration), the Vetterli’s dual rear locking lugs made it an exceptionally strong action for the time. The original cartridge for the Italian Vetterli was a 10.4x47mm black powder round, a slightly longer and more powerful version of the Swiss cartridge, which paired a roughly 313-grain lead bullet with 62 grains of black powder, making it a reasonably powerful but slightly milder cartridge compared to other large-bore black powder cartridges of the time.
The Vetterli continued to be produced in the original 1870 configuration for many years, with minor cartridge improvements and some changes to the safety being made along the way. In 1887, the first major upgrade to the Vetterli was adopted: the Vitali magazine, designed by Italian Captain Giuseppe Vitali, was an adaption of the 1870 Vetterli rifle to attach a 4-round box magazine, which could be loaded using charger clips made from a piece of wood with two pieces of tin nailed into it, which retained the cartridges until they were inserted into the magazine. This update to the rifle provided repeating firepower and rapid loading. A basic summary of the more significant changes made to convert the 1870 pattern rifles into the new 1870/87 pattern are as follows:
Milling out the bottom of the receiver to allow for the addition of the magazine
Milling out the top of the receiver to increase the size of the loading port
Adding a supporting plate surrounding the magazine (early style used only two crossbolts through the stock)
Cutting down the dust cover to retain its function of retaining the bolt wedge and allowing it to act as a magazine cutoff
Adding cartridge stops on both sides of the receiver (slots were milled out for the cartridge stop heads to protrude through)
Adding a bolt support rail to the tang to provide for better cycling of the action in repeated fire
Adding a protrusion to the bottom of the bolt face to pick up cartridges from the magazine
With the adoption of the 1870/87 pattern rifle, rifles currently in Italian service or storage were brought back for updating, and all new production of rifles going forward would be based on the new pattern. The Italians were extremely thorough in their process of updating nearly all existing 1870 patterm Vetterli rifles to the new 1870/87 pattern, making rifles still in the original 1870 configuration extremely scarce today.
Above: The 1870/87 Italian Vetterli. Note the addition of the bolt support rail, the magazine, and the magazine support plate.
Only a few years later, the Vetterli received yet another major upgrade: the adoption of the M.90 smokeless powder 10.4x47mm cartridge. Using balistite as a propellant, this new cartridge featured a jacketed bullet that weighed only 240 grains, but was flying at around 2,000 feet per second, compared to about 1,400 feet per second for the black powder cartridge that preceded it. The adoption of the new cartridge necessitated the replacement of the existing sights with the new M.90 sights to match the new ballistics. As this new cartridge was adopted in 1890, it would be the last major change to the Vetterli rifle for nearly 25 years, as the M1891 Carcano would gradually begin to replace it.
In all, it is estimated that about 1.6 million Vetterli rifles were manufactured. Setting aside the specifics of different patterns, the majority of these rifles, as of the time of Italy’s entry to the First World War, were configured as smokeless powder-firing, large-bore, repeating rifles.
Italy Requires More Rifles
One of the overlooked facts about the Vetterli 1870/87/15 is its designation itself; specifically, the “/15,” denoting the year of the conversion’s adoption, 1915. As Italy declared war on Austria-Hungary in May of 1915, it is clear that the plan to convert the old Vetterli rifles to use the 6.5 Carcano cartridges was not a late-war, reactive response to small arms shortages, but rather a proactive measure taken to start freeing up Carcano rifles to go to frontline service before the situation became too desperate. Reportedly, an initial conversion method was proposed to the Italian Army on May 21st, 1915, just three days before Italy’s declaration of war. That method, however, was rejected, likely due to its requirement of newly produced barrels, whereas the conversion method that would ultimately be used did not require new barrels. The conversion itself had good reasoning behind it: supply logistics would not be impeded if there was no need to provide two types of ammunition, each with their own charging/feeding device, to soldiers. It should be noted that Italy did field Vetterli 1870/87 rifles chambered in the 10.4x47mm cartridge during the war, as evidenced through many photos available depicting Italian troops armed with them, though specific details on their usage are severely lacking. A photograph in “Caporetto and the Isonzo Campaign” by John MacDonald and Željko Cimprič depicts an Italian soldier carrying a Vetterli 1870/87, complete with the original sword-type bayonet, while standing guard over captured Austro-Hungarian soldiers at Caporetto in the early stages of the war.
Between 1915 and 1918, several hundred thousand Vetterli 1870/87 rifles were converted to the 1870/87/15 pattern. In his book “The Italian Vetterli Rifle,” Robert Wilsey notes that around 400,000 rifles were converted, while other sources have quoted numbers ranging from 500,000 to 700,000. An Italian Army source notes that 700,768 rifles were converted. This is likely to be the more accurate number, as subtracting it from the remaining ~900,000 rifles Italy would have had after sending 400,000 1870/87 pattern rifles to Russia as aid would give an over 3:1 ratio of 6.5mm Vetterlis to 10.4mm Vetterlis, which is certainly reflected in current market availability.
Above: The 1870/87/15 Italian Vetterli
The conversions themselves were extraordinarily efficient, requiring only a handful of major modifications as well as a few minor modifications. These include:
Sleeving the existing barrel to reduce bore size to the appropriate 6.5mm diameter from the original 10.4mm diameter using the Salerno Method of re-lining a barrel
As a note to this, an often repeated line regarding these barrel conversions is that the liners were soft soldered in place and thus were prone to coming loose during repeated fire as the heat melted the solder. The Salerno process does not involve soldering; the liner is fixed in place by forcing hardened rods through it to expand it into the bored-out barrel, which essentially press fits it into place.
Milling out the center of the bolt face to accept the 6.5 Carcano cartridge
This modification was very efficient, as the center of the bolt face could be easily milled out, allowing the edges of the bolt face to support the cartridge.
One oddity that has presented itself is the appearance of several 6.5 converted Vetterli rifles with bolt faces that have been pinned to the bolt body. It would seem as if the process for these involved cutting off the original bolt face and simply pinning a new one on. Though at first this might seem like an alternate (and somewhat concerning) method of doing the bolt modification, the length of the bolt face piece that has been attached to the bolt varies from rifle to rifle, indicating that it may have been done as a headspace correction method. This aspect of the 6.5 Vetterli rifles is still being researched.
Note: As of January 2024, it is now understood that these bolt heads are in fact pinned to the bolt body. Previously, the belief was that they were either brazed or soldered on. This changed when I received a rifle that had a loose pin, which was able to be easily driven out, allowing the bolt head to be removed. The age of these rifles and condition they are often found in resulted in the pin being concealed and not easily noticeable on many examples.
Modifying the firing pin length and shape to accommodate the bolt modifications
Removing the Vitali magazine and supporting plate that accompanied it
Adding a Mannlicher-style magazine (found in either a flat-sided configuration or with an indentation on the sides of the magazine, possibly for support) and gluing wood support fillers on each side, which fills the space left by the wider Vitali magazine
Milling out the receiver opening to accommodate the longer 6.5 Carcano cartridge
Removing the cartridge stops that were previously added during the conversion to the 1870/87 pattern
Changing the front and rear sights to match the ballistics of the 6.5 Carcano cartridge
Above, left to right: 1870, 1870/87, and 1870/87/15 pattern Italian Vetterli rifle receivers.
Note the drastic differences between the original design the the 1870/87/15. Nearly 30% of the receiver material was removed by the time the rifles finished their final conversion to 6.5 Carcano, a testament to the strength of the original Vetterli design.
Additionally, some early conversions of Vetterli rifles to 6.5mm appear to have been done using a method proposed by Beretta, with those conversions having longer bolt support rails as well as an enlarged loading port and having the magazine moved slightly rearward. These are relatively uncommon and are referred to as the “Versione X” (Wilsey, A Newly Discovered Vetterli Variant: The “Versione X”, Man at Arms magazine, October 2019), though no official designation has been found yet.
Shooting the Vetterli 1870/87/15 Rifles
The safety of the Vetterli 1870/87/15 conversions is often debated amongst collectors, with arguments ranging from complete dismissal of the conversion’s viability (“These guns are pipe bombs and should NEVER be fired”) to complete trust in their safety (“I have fired hundreds of rounds of surplus 6.5m ammo through them without issue”). This is by far one of the most common discussions about the 1870/87/15 rifles and can be seen nearly every time they are brought up. Without going to extreme detail, some basic facts about these conversions must be presented:
With over 1,300,000 rifles held in reserve at the start of the First World War, it is necessary that appropriate ammunition reserves must have also existed to accompany the rifles. A 1927 Army Staff source notes inventory of 1,316,000 rifles and 125 million rounds of ammunition. Accounting for the aid sent to Russia (400,000 rifles and 8 million rounds of ammunition, per Wilsey), Italian inventory for the war would therefore be 916,000 rifles and 117 million rounds of ammunition, roughly 127 rounds per rifle.
Despite the legitimate logistics and supply difficulties presented by using both the 10.4x47mm and 6.5x52mm cartridges during the conflict, it is unlikely that this alone was enough reasoning to undergo converting upwards of 700,000 rifles. As the 1870/87/15 conversions must have been tested prior to adoption, it is reasonable, and arguably necessary, to assume that their viable service life as tested must have exceeded the amount of 10.4mm rounds available to the rifles in storage. In short, it would hardly make sense to spend the time, materials, and labor to convert a 10.4mm Vetterli to 6.5mm if the rifle could only withstand a few dozen rounds before failing, when significantly more ammunition per rifle was available for the 10.4mm.
It is possible, though, that this could have been a known tradeoff, whereby converting a majority of the existing 1870/87 rifles to the 1870/87/15 pattern would simultaneously increase the amount of cartridges available to each 1870/87 rifle, with the 1870/87/15 rifles deliberately accepting a shorter service life for it. This is unlikely however.
The significant change in the configuration of the Vetterli rifle and the drastic increase in operating pressure from the original 1870 pattern to the 1870/87/15 pattern undoubtedly introduced a much shorter, finite lifespan. Where most all military rifles of the time were designed to, for all practical purposes, operate indefinitely with the issued ammunition, the 1870/87/15 conversions were at the absolute extreme end of the spectrum of how significantly a firearm can be modified from its original design and still function.
As a result of this, the mechanical condition of the 1870/87/15 rifle will degrade at a much faster rate compared to that of, for example, a Mosin Nagant. Simply, firing 1 round of standard-issue ammuntion from a Mosin Nagant will produce negligible degradation to the action, whereas firing 1 round of standard-issue ammunition from a Vetterli 1870/87/15 will have a much greater impact to the mechanical condition.
Accounts of Vetterli 1870/87/15 rifles failing can be found, but it is often very difficult to discern whether the ammunition or the rifle itself was at fault in said accounts as the details provided are often extremely vague. Several factors can play a critical role in causing a failure in these rifles, including:
Inappropriate choice of powder for reducing (not all smokeless powders can be safely reduced without risking pressure spikes)
Inappropriate bullet choice (the 6.5 Carcano .268’ bullet produced, and since discontinued, by Hornady had an incredibly thick jacket that resulted in severe pressure problems even in 1891 Carcano rifles)
As a sub-note, using a combination of the Hornady .268 Carcano bullet and a reduced charge appears to cause an even greater risk of danger as the reduced velocity could lead to the bullet slowing down in the gain twist rifling of the Vetterli 1870/87/15 (or Carcano) barrel, creating a bore obstruction and resulting in a dramatic pressure spike.
Taking factory ammunition (most often PPU) and pulling the bullets, dumping out half the powder, and reseating the bullets (this is essentially a different version of the first point)
Over the past 3 years, my research and testing of the Vetterli 1870/87/15 has culminated in the firing of well over a thousand rounds through a total of 18 different rifles. This has given me the opportunity to observe various factors that contribute or counteract the safety of the rifles. Below are some factors which I believe are critical to verifying the safety of a Vetterli 1870/87/15:
Brass exposure: The Vetterli 1870/87/15 rifles are unique in that unlike almost every other military bolt action rifle made, the chamber opens up directly into the magazine well. This means that you can see the bolt face up against the chamber when the bolt is closed, as well as a sliver of the case head. A first check is to chamber a dummy round and visually check for how much of the case is visible with the bolt closed (this is essentially a headspace check). The closer to zero visible brass, the better. If one sees several mm of brass visible, it could be indicative of significant headspace issues (though I have yet to observe an example of this).
Action lockup: The action should be tested to verify the quality of the lockup. Due to many rifles being made before interchangeable parts processes were implemented, there is a degree of variation in the bolt components, which is important to consider since many rifles found today may not have their original bolts in them (these parts are not serialized, so it is impossible to know this). The lockup can be tested by dropping the sear, either by manipulation of the bolt and safety or by dry firing, and holding the trigger down while grabbing the bolt from the rear and attempting to move it forwards and rearwards. Ideally, there should be little to no free movement of the bolt, but some degree of movement will usually be present. I have not yet encountered issues with rifles having bolts with up to ~1.0mm of free movement.
Properly loaded ammunition: My testing with various powders and bullets has shown that powder selection is critical to ensure a proper gas seal in a reduced power load. IMR 4198 performed relatively well in this application, though Accurate 5744 produced the best results. Unique powder has been referenced frequently in forums, though I have not yet tested it. 5744 was able to create a reasonably low power load (less than 25,000 PSI) while also having a relatively fast peak pressure time, preventing gas escape. Bullet selection is also very important, with bullets such as Hornady’s .264’ 140-grain BTHP bullet (item #26335) having a much smaller bearing surface as opposed to the torpedo-shaped bullets used in military 6.5 Carcano ammunition, which aids in keeping pressures low. Other 6.5mm .264” bullets performed relatively similarly in terms of accuracy.
Overpressure signs were noted when using the discontinued 6.5 Carcano .268” bullet from Hornady along with a reduced powder charge. This bullet should be avoided at all costs.
Use of good quality/condition brass: To best avoid any incidents of case head separation around the unsupported portion of the case, it is ideal to use fresh, unfired brass when loading for the Vetterlis in 6.5 Carcano. Additionally, limiting the number of reloads before switching to more fresh brass is recommended.
Of the 18 rifles I have fired, about 14 of them had come from Ethiopia, where they undoubtedly saw much more use and abuse than rifles that did not go into the region. The variation in the above safety factors among those rifles allowed me to test a wide range of rifle conditions for any possible failures, though none have occurred thus far. Additionally, torture tests with a randomly selected Vetterli 1870/87/15 have resulted in loads as high as 20% over maximum data being fired with no damage to the rifle, though this is obviously never recommended for normal use. It is certainly advisable to stay aware when shooting one as reducing a load too far can result in a squibbed barrel. Periodic visual checks of the bolt collar for any cracks beginning to form is also wise. With proper safety checks and ammunition loaded to an appropriate level, these rifles absolutely can be fired today, and are in fact very enjoyable to shoot.
Special acknowledgement must be given to Robert Wilsey, whose fantastic book The Italian Vetterli Rifle: Development, Variants and History in Service laid the groundwork for research into these previously mysterious and under-studied firearms. Additionally, special thanks to Diego Bianco for providing several Italian Army documents outlining Italian inventories of Vetterli rifles and ammunition during WW1.
To see more of Frantic's content, go to his YouTube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/@Franticalmond2